I am not a communist lets get that straight

[TxGypsy]

The biggest problem would be paperwork and taxes.  If these issues could be dealt with, I think it is a great idea.  Especially if there were numerous parcels of land purchased in many different places.  A core group could pool X amount of money to buy properties.  If someone already owned land in a desirable location, maybe they could use that as part of their portion of the investment.  Folks that didn't make the initial investments could pay a very reasonable fee to use the property and that could help pay taxes. 

I'd recommend not to make improvements on the properties as that would raise taxes.  A small trailer with a water haul tank at each site would be a great asset.  Taxes on unimproved land are usually very reasonable.

I would personally enjoy having somewhere that I could do a bit of gardening during the summer months.

[sparky1]

My 2 cents
  I have let (2) different people come here to have a power & me repair their vehicles---hell I couldn't even get a (thanks) much less help me do something. come to the house eat,,zip gone back to their van no help--(can I do the dishes at least NEVER HAPPEN ) stay up all night on his computer to tired in the day to help me.
  a group will fight over who used the most electricity,( and I'm not paying THAT.!!! then the (1) [leader]will be stuck with the whole bill.  
well if you might be able to do that 's that's fine. my place is NOT a desert, I've been here 29 years--it may not be a resort RV park. but you don't come here to trash my place..
yep i'm  venting, you want to live like a pig===go elsewhere.
sparky1

[VanLifeCrisis]

I dunno, seems like a recipe for disputes later on.  I mean, you put your money in and then what?  Whose name does the land actually go in, and who is legally responsible for the taxes?   Would you buy a large plot of land then deed parcels out to the investors?

[rokguy]

Wagoneer,
In a perfect world that sounds great.
I think you might just be better buying it yourself and using it as a base for you only.
Cop the taxes and maintenance, Less hassle in the long run.
Geoff.

[TxGypsy]

Maybe rather than owning parcels of land communally.....folks own parcels of land themselves and form a group.  You can camp on my place and Susy can camp on my place....and I can camp on your place and I can camp on Susy's place.  I like this idea a lot, because I already own the perfect place

[Scar]

Well we could have little 'Honeys Parks' all over, and I'm ok with you using the name.   But in truth buying land side by side is an option, and combining/using as a communal park but, purchasing acreage and then selling mini plots within it leads to all sorts of planning & zoning issues subdividing, and legal hassles this way could kill the idea.  btw: from past life experience, I hate planning and zoning...

[Guest]

0 acres still isn't a lot of land , as far as self sufficiency goes.

[twokniveskatie]

I moved the lost tribe to it's own home In boondocking :-)

[rubbertramp]

i think buying the land together would be too complicated it would be cool if i had a piece of land say maine and two knives kate had land in arizona  and would let other people visit so it could be shared but no legal issues

[wagoneer]

It's great to hear people chiming in. Thanks